Compare
AtRisk vs CheckVibe
Choose CheckVibe for breadth across SEO, AEO, and uptime. Choose AtRisk for continuous security for AI-built apps: live URL + repo, Linked findings, IDE fix prompts, and verify-after-fix.
Where AtRisk wins
- Linked URL to repo findings (secrets, CSP/headers)
- Paste-ready fix prompts for Cursor and Claude Code
- Mark fixed and re-check on demand
- Pro CI deploy gate (GitHub Action + SARIF)
Where CheckVibe wins
- SEO, AEO, and uptime checks in one product
- Broader non-security launch checklist coverage
Side by side
| Dimension | AtRisk | CheckVibe |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Continuous security for AI-built apps (URL + repo) | Security + SEO/AEO/uptime breadth |
| Cross-layer | Linked live findings to repo source | Typically URL-plane checks |
| Remediation | IDE fix prompts + MCP + re-check | Checklist-oriented output |
| Continuous | On-demand re-scan + Pro deploy gate (no weekly monitors on these plans) | Uptime and recurring scans in suite |
Prefer AtRisk's Linked URL↔repo loop? Scan free, then upgrade when the report earns it.
Also see AtRisk vs Sekrd.