Compare
AtRisk vs Sekrd
Choose Sekrd for deeper Supabase and Firebase RLS audits. Choose AtRisk for automated security for AI apps across the live URL and GitHub repo, with Linked findings and IDE fix prompts.
Where AtRisk wins
- Continuous URL + repo security loop
- Linked correlation across live site and source
- IDE fix prompts, inbox, MCP, and Ship/Block
- Pro CI deploy gate for shipping teams
Where Sekrd wins
- Deep Supabase / Firebase RLS and policy analysis
- Strong pre-launch Ship/Block style depth on database rules
Side by side
| Dimension | AtRisk | Sekrd |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Continuous security for AI-built apps (URL + repo) | Deep RLS / database policy audits |
| Best fit | Teams shipping often with AI IDEs | Apps heavy on Supabase/Firebase policies |
| Remediation | Fix prompts + mark fixed + re-check | AI-ready fixes oriented to policy depth |
| Overlap | Security for AI-built apps | Security for AI-built apps |
Prefer AtRisk's Linked URL↔repo loop? Scan free, then upgrade when the report earns it.
Also see AtRisk vs CheckVibe.