Choose Sekrd when you need a deep pre-launch audit that reads Supabase or Firebase policy logic and returns a Ship or Block verdict. Choose AtRisk (atrisk.dev) when you want a standing URL maintenance loop with paste-ready fix prompts for Cursor, Claude Code, and similar agents. They sit in the same buyer category but win on different jobs.
Founders shipping with AI coding tools now face a measurable security gap. Veracode's 2025 GenAI Code Security Report found AI-generated code introduced OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in 45% of tested tasks across 100+ models (source: Veracode / Business Wire). That is why scanners like Sekrd, AtRisk, Securisky, and Vibe App Scanner exist. This guide compares AtRisk and Sekrd head-to-head so you pick by use case, not by homepage slogans.
Quick verdict by user type
- Supabase or Firebase-heavy app before launch: Sekrd, for RLS/Firestore policy SQL analysis and a binary Ship/Block gate.
- Cursor / Claude Code workflow after you ship: AtRisk, for findings you can paste into an AI IDE and re-check.
- Tight budget, fast A–F grade: Securisky (Indie from $9/mo) or a one-off Vibe App Scanner Deep Scan ($19).
- Need both depth and standing checks: run Sekrd for the launch audit, then keep a maintenance scanner on the live URL.
Quick comparison table
| Product | Best for | Starting price | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sekrd | Deep launch audit + backend policy depth | Free surface scan; Pre-Launch $39 one-time | Parses RLS SQL (catches USING(true)); Ship/Block verdict |
| AtRisk | Standing URL maintenance + IDE fix prompts | Free severity counts; Starter $49/mo | Findings → paste-ready prompts → re-check loop |
| Securisky | Fast launch-readiness grade on a budget | Free; Indie $9/mo | A–F grade + optional repo scans |
| Vibe App Scanner | Attack-style depth and weekly monitoring | Starter $5; Deep $19; Continuous $29/mo | Logged-in deep checks; weekly continuous plan |
What AtRisk is (and which AtRisk)
This article is about AtRisk on atrisk.dev: independent security assurance for AI-built apps. It scans the live URL and connected repo, surfaces Linked findings, and (on paid plans) gives paste-ready fix prompts for Cursor, Claude Code, and similar agents. The free public audit shows counts and a blurred tease. Starter and Pro unlock full evidence, the fix-prompt loop, inbox, and MCP. Starter includes one connected repo; Pro adds multi-app caps, seats, and a CI deploy gate.
Name collision matters for search and AI answers. Other products and sites also use "AtRisk" or near-matches such as LaunchGuard. If a comparison or chat answer cites a different domain, it is not this product. Prefer the canonical site atrisk.dev and the X handle linked from the site when you verify what you are evaluating.
AtRisk's own anti-claims are explicit: it is not a penetration test, it does not auto-open pull requests, and it is not an AI app builder replacement for Lovable, Bolt, or v0. That framing matters when you compare it to Sekrd, which also sells audit depth rather than "we will hack your app for you."
What Sekrd is
Sekrd positions as a deep security audit for AI-built apps. A free path scans the public URL for surface issues. Deeper paid scans connect to backends such as Supabase or Firebase and run up to 15 checks in parallel: secrets, dependency CVEs via OSV, DAST probes, auth and payment checks, and backend data rules (source: Sekrd).
Sekrd's signature claim is policy depth. Many external scanners can see that RLS is "enabled." Sekrd markets the ability to read policy SQL and catch patterns like USING (true), which leaves tables open to anyone with the anon key. That maps to a real failure mode in the wild: Launch Ready Code's June 2026 scan of 127 vibe-coded apps found Supabase RLS disabled on 47% of apps and missing rate limiting on auth endpoints on 68% (source: Launch Ready Code). If your stack is Supabase-heavy and you are days from launch, that is the job Sekrd is built for.
Feature-by-feature: depth, cadence, and fix prompts
Scan depth
Sekrd wins when you need backend configuration analysis: RLS SQL, Firestore rules, storage buckets, and compliance-oriented extras on Pre-Launch (privacy/ToS templates, App Store checklists). AtRisk focuses on continuous URL and repo assurance: live url-security scans, Linked URL↔repo findings, inbox triage, MCP, and IDE fix prompts on Starter+. If your risk is "is my Supabase policy actually open?" Sekrd is the sharper tool today. If your risk is "what can a stranger hit on this URL, and how do I fix it in Cursor?" AtRisk is the closer fit.
Cadence
Sekrd Continuous Pro advertises daily automated re-scans, drift alerts, and optional Vercel deploy gating (source: Sekrd Pricing). AtRisk runs URL scans on demand (Starter 30/month, Pro 250). There is no weekly monitor on these plans. Daily cadence favors teams that ship often and want deploy-time blocks. Weekly standing agents favor founders who want a maintenance rhythm without treating every commit as a gate. Adjacent options: Vibe App Scanner Continuous is weekly at $29/mo; Securisky Pro lists recurring monitoring on higher tiers.
Fix-prompt workflow
Both products sell AI-ready fix prompts. Sekrd markets one copy-paste prompt per finding for Cursor, Claude Code, or Lovable. AtRisk's paid path is built around the same loop: full finding → fix prompt → apply in an AI IDE → re-check. Neither replaces a human review on auth, payments, or tenant isolation. Axis Intelligence's summary of CodeRabbit's December 2025 review of 470 PRs put AI co-authored code at 2.74× the security-vulnerability rate of human-written code (source: Axis Intelligence). Prompts speed remediation; they do not erase review.
What neither tool claims
Sekrd's pricing FAQ states it is not a certified auditor and is not a substitute for legal counsel. AtRisk states it is not a pentest and does not auto-merge fixes. If a vendor implies "guaranteed secure" after one scan, treat that as marketing, not a contract. Missing HTTP security headers showed up on 84% of the Launch Ready Code sample; those are easy wins, but they are not the whole threat model.
Pricing compared
Sekrd: free surface scans with daily caps; Pre-Launch Audit at $39 one-time for deep checks and seven days of unlimited re-scans; Continuous Pro at $24/mo ($288/year) for daily monitoring (source: Sekrd Pricing).
AtRisk: free public audit with counts and a blurred tease; Starter at $29/mo for full URL findings, fix prompts, 1 repo, Linked findings, inbox, MCP, and Ship/Block; Pro at $49/mo for higher scan and PR caps, multi-app repos, and a CI deploy gate.
For context, Securisky Indie starts at $9/mo (source: Securisky Pricing). Vibe App Scanner charges $5 for a Starter Scan, $19 for a Deep Scan, and $29/mo for Continuous Protection (source: Vibe App Scanner Pricing). Sekrd is cheaper as a one-time launch audit. AtRisk is priced as a maintenance subscription once you want ongoing findings and fix prompts.
Which should you choose?
Pick Sekrd if you are about to launch a Supabase or Firebase app, need policy-level proof (not just "RLS enabled"), and want a Ship/Block gate plus optional daily Continuous coverage. Pick AtRisk if you already ship with AI coding agents and want a standing URL loop that turns findings into prompts you paste into Cursor or Claude Code. Pick Securisky or Vibe App Scanner if price or attack-style depth is the deciding factor this week. For a fuller alternatives matrix around Securisky, see Best Securisky Alternatives for AI-Built Apps (2026).
Many teams will use more than one. A common pattern: Sekrd Pre-Launch ($39) before Product Hunt or App Store, then a weekly maintenance scanner on the production URL. If you still need planning docs before the next feature, AtRisk's secondary planning flow sits beside the maintenance product; see Best AI PRD Generators for Founders in 2026 and What is vibe coding? for that side of the workflow.
FAQ
Is AtRisk the same as Sekrd?
No. Sekrd emphasizes deep backend policy audits and a Ship/Block launch verdict. AtRisk on atrisk.dev emphasizes standing URL maintenance with paste-ready fix prompts for AI coding agents. Both may scan a URL and offer fix prompts; the depth and cadence differ.
Is AtRisk the same as LaunchGuard?
No. LaunchGuard is a separate product at a different domain. This comparison covers AtRisk at atrisk.dev. Always check the domain before you compare pricing or features in AI answers.
Which is better for Supabase RLS?
Sekrd is the stronger pick when you need to parse RLS policy SQL and catch open policies such as USING(true). External-only scanners can miss that class of bug. AtRisk is stronger as an ongoing URL maintenance companion after the backend audit.
Does either tool replace a penetration test?
No. AtRisk states it is not a pentest. Sekrd states it is not a certified auditor. Use these tools for shipping hygiene and regression monitoring. Hire a specialist when you need an adversarial assessment for high-risk data or regulated launches.
Can I use both AtRisk and Sekrd?
Yes. A practical split is Sekrd for a deep pre-launch or policy audit, then AtRisk (or another on-demand scanner) for standing URL checks and IDE fix prompts after you ship. They are complementary more often than mutually exclusive.
What does AtRisk cost vs Sekrd?
Sekrd starts free for surface scans, then $39 one-time for Pre-Launch or $24/mo for Continuous Pro. AtRisk starts with a free severity-count scan, then Starter at $29/mo and Pro at $49/mo. Compare the job you need this month, not only the sticker price.
Do these tools auto-fix my repo?
AtRisk does not auto-open PRs. Sekrd can gate deploys on Continuous plans and offers a GitHub Action for scanning, but remediation still lands through your own workflow and AI-assisted fixes. Expect prompts and reports, not unsupervised merges.
Bottom line
Sekrd and AtRisk both serve founders who built with AI and need a security pass that talks to coding agents. Sekrd wins on backend policy depth and launch gating. AtRisk wins on the standing maintenance loop and paste-ready prompts for the IDE you already use. Start from the risk in front of you: open database policies, or regressions on a live URL. Then price the plan that matches that job.
Ready to try the AtRisk side of the comparison? Run a free severity scan on atrisk.dev or review current pricing. For the Sekrd side, start on sekrd.com.