The best Securisky alternatives in 2026 are AtRisk for a standing URL and repo assurance loop, Sekrd for deep Supabase or Firebase policy audits, Veilguard for a free forever grade, Vibe App Scanner for attack-style live depth, and hackit.cloud for weekly plain-English email briefs. Stay on Securisky when you want the cheapest Indie entry, transparent pattern counts, and a fast A–F score.
AI coding tools still ship insecure defaults at scale. Veracode's 2026 GenAI Code Security Report puts the average security pass rate across 100+ models at 56% (source: Veracode). Launch Ready Code's June 2026 scan of 127 vibe-coded apps found 71% with at least one P0 finding, including 47% with Supabase RLS disabled on at least one table (source: Launch Ready Code). That is why founders evaluate Securisky, then shop alternatives for depth, monitoring, or an IDE fix loop.
Quick picks
- Need Linked URL↔repo findings + Cursor fix prompts: AtRisk (atrisk.dev)
- Need RLS SQL depth and Ship/Block before launch: Sekrd
- Want a free grade forever: Veilguard
- Want attack-style live probes + MCP: Vibe App Scanner
- Want a weekly email, not a security product: hackit.cloud
Why look beyond Securisky?
Securisky is a strong default for founders who want a ~60 second URL scan, an A–F grade, and (from Indie) repo scans plus AI fix prompts. Its own docs list 49 named patterns across secrets, injection, auth, config, and exposure, with Free limited to secrets and injection (source: Securisky). Indie starts at $9/month, which undercuts most vibe-native scanners.
People still leave. Common reasons: they need continuous monitors after every deploy, they want live findings correlated into the GitHub file that owns the issue, they need deeper backend policy analysis than an external scan can see, or they want weekly briefs for a non-technical owner. None of those jobs make Securisky "bad." They just match other products better. If you are still learning what vibe coding is, start with a free public URL scan on any of these tools before you pay.
Another trigger is scan volume. Securisky Free caps at five URL scans per month on secrets and injection only. Indie unlocks auth patterns and ten repo scans, but teams that ship daily often outgrow a grade-first workflow. That is when standing monitors, Linked inboxes, or Ship/Block launch gates become the deciding feature, not the letter on the first report.
How we evaluated alternatives
We scored each option on five buyer questions, using first-party pricing and positioning pages as of August 2026. Prices move; verify on each vendor site before you buy.
- Does it scan the live URL, the repo, or both?
- Does it give paste-ready fix prompts for Cursor or Claude Code?
- Is there standing monitoring after the first scan?
- What is the real paid entry price for full findings?
- What does the vendor refuse to claim (pentest, auto-PR, SEO kitchen sink)?
We did not rank "most checks" as a winner. Launch Ready Code's dataset shows missing headers on 84% of apps and missing auth rate limits on 68% (source: Launch Ready Code). Count inflation does not fix RLS. Workflow and honesty do.
Comparison at a glance
| Product | Best for | Starting price | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Securisky | Fast A–F grade on a budget | Free; Indie $9/mo | 49 named patterns; URL + repo; GitHub Action |
| AtRisk | Standing URL + repo assurance loop | Free counts; Starter $29/mo | Linked findings; fix prompts; Ship/Block; Pro deploy gate |
| Sekrd | Deep pre-launch backend audits | Free surface; Pre-Launch $39 | RLS SQL parse; Ship/Block; Continuous $24/mo |
| Veilguard | Free grade + cheap monitoring | Free forever; Guard $19/mo | Plain-English fixes; deploy-linked re-scans |
| Vibe App Scanner | Attack-style live depth + MCP | Free score; Go $19/mo | Live DB/auth probes; weekly Pro monitoring |
| hackit.cloud | Weekly email for site owners | Solo from $29/mo | Plain-English briefs; agency white-label |
AtRisk: Best for standing URL + repo assurance
AtRisk on atrisk.dev is automated security for AI apps: live URL scans, GitHub repo agents, Linked URL↔repo findings, paste-ready fix prompts for Cursor and Claude Code, mark fixed and re-check, Ship/Block, MCP, and a Pro CI deploy gate. The free public audit shows severity counts and a blurred tease. Starter is $29/month; Pro is $49/month for multi-app caps, seats, and GitHub Action + SARIF gating.
Where Securisky wins on price and a simple grade, AtRisk wins when you already ship often and need the loop after the first scan. Linked findings point live issues (secrets, source maps, CSP, headers) into source so the inbox is not just a severity list. That matters when Veracode's spring 2026 update still finds roughly 45% of AI generation tasks introducing a known flaw without security guidance (source: Veracode blog).
The paid loop is deliberate: generate a fix prompt, paste it into Cursor or Claude Code, ship, mark fixed, then re-check the live URL. Monitors keep coverage on. Pro adds a GitHub Action + SARIF deploy gate so open findings can block merges. AtRisk is not a pentest, does not auto-open PRs, and is not an SEO/AEO suite. For a head-to-head with Sekrd, see AtRisk vs Sekrd.
Sekrd: Best for deep pre-launch RLS audits
Sekrd sells a Ship/Block launch verdict and deeper backend analysis. Free covers surface findings. Pre-Launch is a $39 one-time deep audit with fix prompts and PDF extras. Continuous Pro is $24/month with daily re-scans and a Vercel deploy gate (source: Sekrd Pricing).
Sekrd's clearest win over Securisky is policy depth. External scanners often stop at "RLS enabled." Sekrd markets reading policy SQL and catching patterns like USING (true). That maps to Launch Ready Code's finding that nearly half of scanned vibe apps leave Supabase RLS off on at least one table. Choose Sekrd when launch risk is backend rules. Choose Securisky or AtRisk when you want a standing external loop without connecting the database for policy parsing.
Veilguard: Best free grade and light monitoring
Veilguard keeps the A–F grade and full issue list free forever with no signup. Fix Pack is $19 one-time for one scan's fixes. Guard is $19/month for unlimited scans, deploy re-scans, and email alerts (source: Veilguard). Messaging is tuned to Lovable, Bolt, Supabase, and Firebase failure modes.
Pick Veilguard when Securisky's Free tier (5 URL scans/month, secrets + injection only) feels too tight and you still do not want a $49 standing product. AtRisk still wins if you need Linked correlation and a Pro merge gate. Veilguard wins if "show me the grade for free, forever" is the job.
Vibe App Scanner: Best attack-style live depth
Vibe App Scanner (vas) markets live probes against databases, auth, and APIs, then hands fixes to coding agents over MCP or copy-paste. Go is $19/month (20 scans, unlock findings). Pro is $39/month with weekly deep scans and monitoring (source: Vibe App Scanner). Coverage also includes SEO/AEO and other suite checks, which AtRisk deliberately skips.
Choose vas when you want deeper live probing than a header-and-bundle pass, and you already drive Cursor or Claude Code over MCP. Choose Securisky when you want a transparent pattern catalog and a lower Indie price. Choose AtRisk when Linked URL↔repo correlation and a security-only loop matter more than suite breadth.
hackit.cloud: Best weekly email briefs
hackit.cloud is built for site owners who want a Monday brief, not a developer security console. Solo starts around $29/month for one site with weekly scans. Studio and Agency tiers add multi-site and white-label reports (source: hackit.cloud).
This is the weakest "Securisky alternative" if your job is vibe-coded app launch readiness. It is the strongest alternative if your buyer is an agency or non-technical owner who will never open a GitHub repo scan. Georgia Tech's Vibe Security Radar tracked 35 CVEs attributed to AI coding tools in March 2026 alone (source: Simon Roses field guide citing Georgia Tech). Weekly email still helps, but it does not replace a Linked fix loop for Cursor users.
When to stay on Securisky
Stay if Indie at $9/month covers your scan volume, you like named pattern counts over marketing claim lists, and you want URL + repo + GitHub Action without paying for monitors or Linked correlation. Securisky is explicit that it is not enterprise SCA, not a pentest, and not a compliance certification. That honesty is a reason to keep it, not leave.
Also stay if your team already wired the Securisky GitHub Action and API tokens into CI. Switching scanners mid-sprint costs more than the $40 monthly gap to AtRisk Starter. Migrate when the missing piece is standing verify-after-fix, Linked inbox triage, or a merge gate that speaks SARIF to GitHub code scanning.
Switch when your bottleneck is something else: Sekrd for policy SQL, AtRisk for the standing IDE loop, Veilguard for free forever grading, vas for deeper live probes, hackit.cloud for email-first monitoring. See the AtRisk product tour if you want the URL + repo + Linked model spelled out without a sales deck.
FAQ
What is the best free Securisky alternative?
Veilguard's free forever grade is the closest free alternative if you only need an A–F score and issue list. AtRisk's free public audit shows counts and a blurred tease, then unlocks full evidence on paid plans. Securisky Free itself remains useful for five URL scans per month on secrets and injection.
Is AtRisk cheaper than Securisky?
No on entry price. Securisky Indie is $9/month. AtRisk Starter is $29/month. You pay AtRisk for Linked findings, Ship/Block, MCP, and (on Pro) a deploy gate, not for the cheapest A–F grade.
Which alternative is best for Supabase RLS?
Sekrd if you need policy SQL analysis and a Ship/Block launch verdict. Veilguard and Vibe App Scanner also emphasize live Supabase failure modes. AtRisk correlates related live issues into the repo and helps you verify after a fix, but it does not claim Sekrd-level RLS SQL parsing.
Do any of these tools replace a penetration test?
No. Securisky, AtRisk, Sekrd, Veilguard, and vas all sit below a human adversarial assessment. Use them for shipping hygiene and regression monitoring. Hire a specialist when the blast radius or compliance bar requires it.
Can I use Securisky and AtRisk together?
Yes. A practical split is Securisky or Sekrd for a cheap or deep first pass, then AtRisk for standing URL + repo checks and IDE fix prompts after you ship. Overlap is fine; conflicting severity labels are normal across vendors.
Which tool has the best Cursor or Claude Code workflow?
AtRisk and Vibe App Scanner both emphasize paste-ready or MCP-driven fixes. Securisky and Sekrd also ship AI fix prompts on paid tiers. Pick based on whether you want Linked correlation (AtRisk), live attack-style depth (vas), or pattern-catalog grading (Securisky).
Why are there so many vibe security scanners in 2026?
Because the failure rate did not improve with model size. Veracode's multi-year testing still shows security pass rates stuck near the mid-50s while syntax correctness climbed past 95%. Founders need scanners tuned to AI-built apps, not only enterprise SAST.